Digital Product Passport (DPP) / product transparency tool

Supply chain traceability platform

Renoon, Digital Product Passport Platform

Renoon is a SaaS platform that creates Digital Product Passports by integrating compliance, ESG data, and supply-chain traceability, enabling brands to publish verified product information via QR codes and web interfaces. It targets brands and retailers in apparel, textiles, footwear, and related sectors, with adaptations for SMEs, and supports multi-tier supplier data exchange. Key strengths include LCA calculation, risk assessment tools, blockchain partnerships, and comprehensive data handling through APIs and automation.

AI-generated from all supplier submitted data.

Quick facts

Vendor

Renoon Tech BV

Phone

+31 651428947

Started (year)

2021

Country of origin

Netherlands

SME adaption

The tool has SME adaptions

Blockchain implementation

Partnership with Aura Blockchain Consortium

API integration approach

Both, depending on system and use case

Free test version

No

Primary data contributors

Primarily entered by the brand / central user

Details

Description by tool provider

  • Renoon is a comprehensive platform specialized in Digital Product Passport that unifies compliance, ESG and supply-chain traceability, then publishes verified data to customer-facing pages
  • turning regulatory needs into one end-to-end system and brand experience.

Product segments covered by the tool

  • Apparel
  • Home textiles
  • Textile & leather accessories and goods -
  • Footwear
  • Furniture
  • Sports & outdoor equipment
  • Other non-textile products

Platform technologies

  • Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
  • AI/Machine learning models
  • QR code tagging
  • Graph database
  • Cloud-hosted platform
  • Role-based access control (RBAC)

Data input/output methods

  • Manual data entry
  • Bulk upload/export (Excel / CSV)
  • Inbound APIs
  • Outbound APIs
  • Event-based APIs (webhooks, outbound)
  • Reporting export
  • Workflow automation

Chemical substance traceability

Chain-of-custody is a continuity capability; composition and substance traceability are depth capabilities. Neither replaces the other.

  • Supplier visibility/supply chain mapping - The system stores structured information about suppliers beyond Tier 1 (e.g. role, tier, location).
  • Product–supplier association - Specific products (styles, SKUs, batches) are linked to the suppliers involved in their production.
  • Material flow / chain-of-custody tracking - Material inputs, outputs, and transformations between supply-chain actors are recorded using a defined chain-of-custody model.
  • Product composition / component traceability - Products are represented as structured compositions (e.g. components, ingredients) that can be independently traced to upstream sources.
  • Process & substance (chemical) traceability - Substances used in manufacturing processes can be recorded and linked to facilities, process steps, and affected products.

Sustainability Impact categories

Impact data coverage describes which sustainability-related topics a platform can store and manage data for. It does not indicate the quality of the data, the methodology used, or whether impacts meet specific regulatory thresholds.

  • Material attributes - (e.g. fiber type, recycled / biobased content, origin attributes)
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data - (e.g. environmental footprint indicators at product or material level)
  • Supplier processes & practices - (e.g. production processes, management systems, operational practices)
  • Human rights & working conditions - (e.g. labor practices, social compliance data)

Types of sustainability impact data

Impact data coverage indicates what topics a system can handle; traceability capabilities indicate how precisely that data can be linked to products, materials, and processes.

  • Qualitative data - (e.g. yes/no answers, self-assessments, policy statements)
  • Quantitative data - (e.g. numeric values, measurements, calculated indicators)
  • Verification & audit evidence - (e.g. audit results, third-party verification status)
  • Certificates & formal attestations - (e.g. certificates linked to suppliers, materials, or products)
  • Calculated / derived indicators - (e.g. system-generated metrics based on underlying data)

Life Cycle Assessment  (LCA) handling

Product carbon footprint (PCF) calculations represent a single impact category and do not constitute a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which covers multiple environmental impact categories across the product life cycle

  • LCA results from external tools can be imported and stored - (e.g. impact indicators calculated elsewhere)
  • The platform includes LCA calculation functionality - (e.g. impacts are calculated within the system - multiple impact categories)
  • Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data can be stored and managed - (e.g. LCA-ready process inputs/outputs, background data, activity data)

LCA frameworks supported

  • ISO 14040 / 14044
  • EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)

Risk assessment support

Risk assessment functionality indicates whether a platform supports identifying, prioritising, or visualising potential sustainability or compliance risks. Approaches vary significantly between tools and may rely on user-defined criteria, predefined rules, or system-generated indicators. Risk assessments are intended to support prioritisation and decision-making. They do not in themselves constitute legal compliance or due diligence.

  • Manual or externally defined risk assessments can be stored - (e.g. risk ratings entered by users or imported from external sources)
  • Rule-based risk assessments are supported - (e.g. risks derived from predefined rules or thresholds)
  • Data-driven risk indicators are generated by the system - (e.g. risk signals based on traceability or impact data)
  • Risk visualisation and hotspot identification - (e.g. dashboards, maps, or prioritisation views)

Value chain actors involved in data exchange

  • Brand / retailer users - (e.g. internal teams managing products, suppliers, or reporting)
  • Tier 1 suppliers - (e.g. cut-and-sew factories, final assemblers)
  • Tier 2 suppliers - (e.g. mills, dye houses, processors)
  • Tier 3+ suppliers - (e.g. raw material processors, fiber producers)
  • Consumers or external stakeholders - (e.g. read-only access via QR/DPP)

Consumer-facing access to product data

  • Consumer-facing product views are provided - (e.g. via QR code, URL, or Digital Product Passport interface)
  • Consumer-facing content is configurable by the brand - (e.g. control over which data is displayed)
  • External stakeholder access (read-only) - (e.g. regulators, auditors, partners)

Digital Product Passport (DPP) development activity

  • DPP implementation with Tods: from scattered data to a scalable, publication-ready passport. We led data mapping, unified schema design, validation system, partner coordination and consumer front-end. First 100 SKUs live in ~3 months (-75% time-to-market)
  • now scaling collection by collection.

EU regulatory readiness

Regulatory readiness reflects how a provider monitors and responds to evolving EU sustainability and supply chain regulations. It does not constitute a claim of legal compliance, as regulatory scope and timelines are still evolving.

EU regulatory developments shape our roadmap. We contribute to the JRC preparatory study, EU-funded groups like CIRPASS-2, and GS1 working groups, and collaborate with law firms and consultancies to align product features, pilots, and reporting tools with upcoming requirements.